VCC
VerifyCarCarrier.com

VerifyCarCarrier.com

AmeriFreight Auto Transport vs D&W Transport

Independent editorial analysis of AmeriFreight Auto Transport vs D&W Transport, supported by audit data and source checks. No paid placement.

Select Brokers to Compare

Quick answer

AmeriFreight Auto Transport has the stronger current audit profile

AmeriFreight Auto Transport leads this comparison by 20 points in VerifyCarCarrier’s current audit data. That is a meaningful evidence edge, not a guarantee of an individual shipment outcome—confirm the final quote, carrier assignment, pickup window, and cancellation terms before booking.

Independent audit comparisonNo paid placementLatest audited evidence: August 26, 2026

How to use this comparison

Choose based on your shipment—not a headline score alone

The score is a useful starting point, but price certainty, vehicle type, pickup urgency, and the quality of the assigned carrier matter too. We compare audited signals instead of selling rank positions, then link to the underlying broker reports so you can verify the evidence before you request quotes.

Best fit by situation

When each broker may make more sense

AmeriFreight Auto Transport

95/100 · Top Recommended

Audit lead
  • Standard Open shipping is a stated overall fit
  • strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, urgent pickup, and luxury or high-value vehicles
  • the audit records a low price-change risk signal
Read the full audit →

D&W Transport

75/100 · Strong Recommended Option

  • Standard Open shipping is a stated overall fit
  • strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, luxury or high-value vehicles, and inoperable vehicles
  • the audit records a low price-change risk signal
Read the full audit →

Broker-by-broker analysis

What the audited evidence says

AmeriFreight Auto Transport

95/100 · Top Recommended · Audited August 26, 2026

Full audit →

AmeriFreight Auto Transport scores 95/100 — Top Recommended — based on active FMCSA authority, a 22-year operating history, substantial review volume, and strong price-transparency evidence. The recommendation comes with an important historical disclosure: in 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final order barring AmeriFreight from deceptively promoting consumer reviews and failing to disclose incentives provided to reviewers. That matter is old and is not evidence that every current review is unreliable, but it is directly relevant when weighing the unusually strong online-review profile. Customers should compare recent reviews across platforms and keep the binding quote and no-deposit terms in writing.

Authority and company record

AMERIFREIGHT INC operates as AmeriFreight Auto Transport under MC-597401 / USDOT 2238770. The August 2026 audit confirmed active FMCSA broker authority, matched the legal and public identities, and verified the website, phone, and email. The company has operated for approximately 22 years and reports a large shipment history. Its longevity and federal registration are meaningful legitimacy signals, but authority should still be rechecked through FMCSA before booking because an audit is a point-in-time review, not a permanent certification.

Reviews and customer experience

AmeriFreight has one of the largest review footprints in this directory: Google was recorded at 4.7★ from 5,215 reviews, TransportReviews at 5.0★ from 1,096 reviews, Trustpilot at 4.7★ from 674 reviews, and ConsumerAffairs at 4.8★ from 4,758 reviews. Yelp is materially lower at 3.0★ from 357 reviews. BBB lists an A accredited profile; the audit recorded 41 complaints over three years, including one matter noted as unresolved or unanswered. The 2015 FTC order is also relevant because it concerned AmeriFreight’s use of discounts and awards connected to customer reviews without adequate disclosure. Large review volume remains useful evidence, but it should not be treated as independent of that history. The audit graded communication, price honesty, pickup, problem handling, and willingness to use the company again as Strong, while delivery was Mixed. Positive accounts frequently mention responsive agents, the no-upfront-deposit model, and a final price matching the written quote. Negative accounts include a minority reporting price changes or service problems after booking. The FTC matter was an administrative consumer-protection enforcement action, not a private damages lawsuit: In the Matter of AmeriFreight, Inc., FTC File No. 142 3249, resulted in a final order in April 2015 concerning deceptive review promotion and undisclosed reviewer incentives.

Pricing and service fit

AmeriFreight is classified as a budget option with Low price-change risk and earned 14/15 for pricing. Its binding-quote and no-upfront-deposit model is a genuine differentiator when the written contract matches the sales representation. Independent reviews cited in the audit praised price transparency, although a minority reported differences between the initial quote and final amount. Customers should confirm whether the document is a binding quote or an estimate, what happens if no carrier accepts it, and whether optional protection products or expedited service change the total. The audit identifies standard open transport as the primary fit and gives the route-and-service category 10/10. Open, enclosed, urgent pickup, and luxury or classic transport were graded Strong; inoperable-vehicle transport was Mixed. AmeriFreight’s scale may help on common interstate routes, but customers moving an inoperable or unusually valuable vehicle should verify equipment requirements, cargo-insurance limits, and carrier experience before release.

Transparency and brand signals

AmeriFreight presents a mature national brand with a working website, extensive third-party coverage, and a long public operating history. The audit’s brand score was 10/10. The central transparency issue is historical rather than hidden: the FTC’s 2015 final order must be considered alongside the company’s current high ratings. A balanced reading gives weight to recent cross-platform volume, Yelp and BBB complaint patterns, the age of the enforcement action, and the exact written terms offered for the current shipment.

Positive signals

  • Active FMCSA broker authority under MC-597401 / USDOT 2238770
  • 4.7★ Google rating across 5,215 reviews
  • 5.0★ TransportReviews rating across 1,096 reviews

What to verify

  • FTC consumer-protection order in 2015 over incentivized reviews and inadequate disclosure
  • Yelp rating is 3.0★ across 357 reviews, well below other platforms
  • 41 BBB complaints were recorded over three years in the audit

D&W Transport

75/100 · Strong Recommended Option · Audited August 17, 2026

Full audit →

This audit gives D&W Transport a score of 75/100 — Strong Recommended Option. We recommend using this broker based on the FMCSA, review, and customer-experience data reviewed. Auditor notes: Complete multi-category audit performed based on verified FMCSA records and rating metrics..

Authority and company record

PAUL DEMARCO holds active FMCSA operating authority, under MC MC-338191 / USDOT 2224054. Its legal name, MC number, and public-facing identity line up consistently. Contact channels (website, phone, email) had at least one channel that failed to respond at time of audit. The company has operated for 15 years, and its public profile is incomplete.

Reviews and customer experience

Across review platforms, PAUL DEMARCO shows 4.6★ on Google (2,010 reviews), 4.6★ on Transport Reviews (20 reviews), 4.5★ on Trustpilot, 4.4★ on ConsumerAffairs. Review activity is fresh, and sentiment is strong across platforms. BBB status is listed as A+, with a low complaint signal. Overall complaint severity in this audit is rated low. Customer accounts describe communication as strong and price honesty as strong. Pickup experiences run strong, and delivery experiences run strong. Problem handling is described as strong, and reports on whether customers would use PAUL DEMARCO again are strong.

Pricing and service fit

PAUL DEMARCO positions itself as a budget option. Consistency between quoted and final price is high, with low risk of price-change complaints. Customers generally describe the value as high. Binding transparent rate policy. Coverage on common shipping lanes is rated strong, with high confidence in route relevance. Best suited for open transport, enclosed transport, luxury or high-value vehicles, inoperable vehicles.

Transparency and brand signals

Website and brand presentation come across as strong, with strong handling of public reviews and strong service transparency. Overall trust feel from this audit is strong.

Positive signals

  • Active FMCSA Authority
  • Strong Customer Reviews

What to verify

No material caution flags are listed in this audit.

Before you book

Get the terms in writing

Ask each broker for the total price, deposit and cancellation terms, pickup window, carrier information when assigned, cargo coverage, and how price changes are handled. A strong audit profile does not replace reading the agreement for your specific shipment.

Frequently asked questions

Side-by-side evidence table

Use these audit signals to check the evidence behind the editorial analysis.

D&W Transport

PAUL DEMARCO

Trust Score
95/100
75/100
Verdict
Top Recommended
Strong Recommended Option
FMCSA Status
Active Authority
Active Authority
Years in Business
22 yrs
15 yrs
Home State
GA
NY
Google Rating
4.7★ · 5,215 reviews
4.6★ · 2,010 reviews
BBB Rating
A
A+
Pricing Style
Budget
Budget
Service Fit
Standard Open is its stated overall fit; strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, urgent pickup, and luxury or high-value vehicles
Standard Open is its stated overall fit; strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, luxury or high-value vehicles, and inoperable vehicles
MC Number
MC-597401
MC-338191