Quick answer
Ground Force One has the stronger current audit profile
Ground Force One leads this comparison by 58 points in VerifyCarCarrier’s current audit data. That is a meaningful evidence edge, not a guarantee of an individual shipment outcome—confirm the final quote, carrier assignment, pickup window, and cancellation terms before booking.
How to use this comparison
Choose based on your shipment—not a headline score alone
The score is a useful starting point, but price certainty, vehicle type, pickup urgency, and the quality of the assigned carrier matter too. We compare audited signals instead of selling rank positions, then link to the underlying broker reports so you can verify the evidence before you request quotes.
Best fit by situation
When each broker may make more sense
Ground Force One
63/100 · Show with Caution
- •Standard Open shipping is a stated fit
- •the audit rates its fit as strong for open transport and enclosed transport
- •15 years in business adds operating history
Soft Trans Auto
5/100 · Do Not Recommend
- •Standard Open shipping is a stated fit
- •15 years in business adds operating history
Broker-by-broker analysis
What the audited evidence says
Ground Force One
63/100 · Show with Caution · Audited August 17, 2026
This audit gives Ground Force One a score of 63/100 — Show with Caution. We do not currently recommend this broker based on the FMCSA, review, and customer-experience data reviewed. Auditor notes: Complete multi-category audit performed based on verified FMCSA records and rating metrics..
Authority and company record
GROUND FORCE ONE BROKERAGE LLC holds active FMCSA operating authority, under MC MC-761691 / USDOT 2249772. Its legal name, MC number, and public-facing identity line up consistently. Contact channels (website, phone, email) had at least one channel that failed to respond at time of audit. The company has operated for 15 years, and its public profile is incomplete.
Reviews and customer experience
Across review platforms, GROUND FORCE ONE BROKERAGE LLC shows 4.8★ on Google (1,730 reviews), 4.2★ on Transport Reviews (40 reviews), 4.1★ on Trustpilot, 4★ on ConsumerAffairs. Review activity is fresh, and sentiment is mixed across platforms. BBB status is listed as A-, with a medium complaint signal. Overall complaint severity in this audit is rated medium. Customer accounts describe communication as strong and price honesty as mixed. Pickup experiences run strong, and delivery experiences run strong. Problem handling is described as mixed, and reports on whether customers would use GROUND FORCE ONE BROKERAGE LLC again are strong.
Pricing and service fit
GROUND FORCE ONE BROKERAGE LLC positions itself as a budget option. Consistency between quoted and final price is medium, with medium risk of price-change complaints. Customers generally describe the value as high. Dynamic market rate estimate. Coverage on common shipping lanes is rated strong, with high confidence in route relevance. Best suited for open transport, enclosed transport, luxury or high-value vehicles, inoperable vehicles.
Transparency and brand signals
Website and brand presentation come across as strong, with mixed handling of public reviews and strong service transparency. Overall trust feel from this audit is strong.
Positive signals
- Active FMCSA Authority
- Strong Customer Reviews
What to verify
- Moderate Pricing Variability
Source checks
Soft Trans Auto
5/100 · Do Not Recommend · Audited August 17, 2026
This audit gives Soft Trans Auto a score of 5/100 — Do Not Recommend. We do not currently recommend this broker based on the FMCSA, review, and customer-experience data reviewed. Auditor notes: Complete multi-category audit performed based on verified FMCSA records and rating metrics..
Authority and company record
EDGARS ERGLIS does not currently show active FMCSA operating authority, under MC MC-1030765 / USDOT 2129252. Its legal name, MC number, and public-facing identity line up consistently. Contact channels (website, phone, email) had at least one channel that failed to respond at time of audit. The company has operated for 15 years, and its public profile is complete.
Reviews and customer experience
Across review platforms, EDGARS ERGLIS shows 3.4★ on Google (19 reviews), 2.9★ on Transport Reviews, 2.8★ on Trustpilot, 2.5★ on ConsumerAffairs. Review activity is stale, and sentiment is weak across platforms. BBB status is listed as B-, with a high complaint signal. Overall complaint severity in this audit is rated high. Customer accounts describe communication as weak and price honesty as weak. Pickup experiences run weak, and delivery experiences run weak. Problem handling is described as weak, and reports on whether customers would use EDGARS ERGLIS again are weak.
Pricing and service fit
EDGARS ERGLIS positions itself as a budget option. Consistency between quoted and final price is low, with high risk of price-change complaints. Customers generally describe the value as medium. Dynamic market rate estimate. Coverage on common shipping lanes is rated weak, with low confidence in route relevance. Weaker fit for open transport.
Transparency and brand signals
Website and brand presentation come across as weak, with mixed handling of public reviews and mixed service transparency. Overall trust feel from this audit is weak.
Positive signals
- Established Brand History
- National Route Coverage
What to verify
- FMCSA authority not confirmed active
- Inactive FMCSA Operating Status
- Moderate Pricing Variability
Source checks
Before you book
Get the terms in writing
Ask each broker for the total price, deposit and cancellation terms, pickup window, carrier information when assigned, cargo coverage, and how price changes are handled. A strong audit profile does not replace reading the agreement for your specific shipment.