Verify Car Carrier

RoadRunner Auto Transport vs SGT Auto Transport

Comparison of available company records for RoadRunner Auto Transport vs SGT Auto Transport. This page is assembled from directory evidence, not a firsthand shipment test. Check each company's evidence and limitations below.

Browse all company comparisons · How we evaluate evidence

Change companies · 2 selected

Your comparison

2 of 3 selected

  • RoadRunner Auto Transport
  • SGT Auto Transport

Type at least 2 characters. Select a result to add it. Up to 3 companies; your comparison link updates automatically.

The short answer

SGT Auto Transport has the stronger current audit profile

SGT Auto Transport leads this comparison by 7 points in Verify Car Carrier’s current audit data. That is a meaningful evidence edge, not a guarantee of an individual shipment outcome—confirm the final quote, carrier assignment, pickup window, and cancellation terms before booking.

Start with the right kind of score

An audit score summarizes evidence. Customer ratings describe reviews. They use different scales and are not interchangeable.

RoadRunner Auto Transport

Independent audit evidence

Audit score · out of 100

70 / 100

Good Option

Evidence dated August 17, 2026

View audit & evidence →

SGT Auto Transport

Independent audit evidence

Audit score · out of 100

77 / 100

Strong Recommended Option

Evidence dated April 6, 2026

Higher current audit scoreView audit & evidence →

How to read this: audit scores use a 100-point scale, not a customer-star scale or a shipment guarantee. Public customer ratings below are out of 5; BBB ratings use the source’s own scale. “Not established” means the available record does not establish that fact. Read the methodology.

The facts, side by side

Compare the available evidence

Audit scores, public ratings and company records are different signals—not a single ranking. Missing data does not establish a finding. Confirm current authority and written terms before booking.

Evidence comparison for selected brokers
Evidence signalRoadRunner Auto Transport

AM FREIGHT OPERATIONS INC

SGT Auto Transport

SGT Auto Transport Corp

Independent audit score · /100
70 / 100
77 / 100
Audit classification
Good Option
Strong Recommended Option
FMCSA authority
Active authority

The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches the existing broker exactly: AM FREIGHT OPERATIONS INC, DBA ROADRUNNER AUTO TRANSPORT, USDOT 3124544 / MC-89820. It lists SHIPPER/BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration, authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), and no out-of-service date. The same snapshot warns that carrier registration information and carrier VMT are outdated and gives an October 7, 2021 MCS-150 filing date. Active authority does not erase that warning or independently verify a current bond or assigned-carrier insurance. The Sherpa snapshot misplaced in this folder belongs to SHERPA AUTO TRANSPORT LLC, USDOT 4085166 / MC-1555035, and is excluded from RoadRunner authority evidence. Zero inspections or crashes in a broker record is not a carrier safety endorsement.

Active authority

The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches USDOT 2521690 / MC-873392, lists legal name SGT AUTO TRANSPORT, entity type BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration and authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), with no out-of-service date. Its physical and mailing address is 80 Orville Drive, Suite 100, Bohemia, New York 11716, with (864) 546-5038. The MCS-150 form-date field is blank; no formation date is inferred from it. This is broker authority, not proof that SGT operates the hauling truck, that a particular carrier is insured, or that live bond status has been checked. Zero power units, inspections and crashes in this broker snapshot are not a fleet safety rating.

Years in Business
8 years recorded in the audit
July 10, 2014 — business started (BBB)

12 completed years as of October 16, 2026.

View business-history source ↗
Home State
NY
NY
Google customer rating · /5
4.1 / 5 · 8,647 reviews

The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for RoadRunner at 15 Grumman Road West, Bethpage shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 Google reviews. This is a saved search capture, not a live Google check. Its ConsumerAffairs web-review snippet has a different count from the supplied direct ConsumerAffairs profile; those counts are not combined.

View Google source ↗
4.6 / 5 · 16,109 reviews

The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for Car Shipping - SGT Auto Transport at 80 Orville Drive, Bohemia shows 4.6/5 from 16,109 Google reviews. A separate organic result displays 4.6 from 16,514; it is not the knowledge-panel count and is not substituted or added. Saved search evidence only; not independently checked live.

View Google source ↗
BBB Rating
A+

V2 Logistics headquarters/group profile, not an AM Freight-only complaint count: 141 complaints in three years, 16 in the last 12 months; 123 answered and 18 resolved. The linked RoadRunner Phoenix branch repeats the 141/16 complaint totals and 4.25/5 from 887 reviews, so these are not independent samples and must not be added together. V2 includes other transport brands. The Phoenix complaint capture contains no matching narratives; the headquarters capture supplies the complaint accounts.

View BBB source ↗
B

BBB reports 186 complaints over three years, including 79 in the last 12 months; its status filters show 163 answered and 23 resolved. Answered means the business addressed the complaint, not that the customer accepted the outcome. Customer reviews are separate from formal complaints; no shipment denominator was supplied to calculate a complaint rate.

View BBB source ↗
Transport Reviews customer rating · /5
Yelp · /5 or platform status
1.7 / 5 · 118 reviewsView Yelp source ↗
2.9 / 5 · 699 reviewsView Yelp source ↗
Trustpilot · /5 or platform status
4.5 / 5 · 2,097 reviewsView Trustpilot source ↗
4.3 / 5 · 1,639 reviewsView Trustpilot source ↗
ConsumerAffairs · /5 or platform status
4.5 / 5 · 1,221 reviewsView ConsumerAffairs source ↗
3.7 / 5 · 1,095 reviewsView ConsumerAffairs source ↗
BBB customer reviews · /5 or platform status
4.25 / 5 · 887 reviews

V2 Logistics headquarters/group profile, not an AM Freight-only complaint count: 141 complaints in three years, 16 in the last 12 months; 123 answered and 18 resolved. The linked RoadRunner Phoenix branch repeats the 141/16 complaint totals and 4.25/5 from 887 reviews, so these are not independent samples and must not be added together. V2 includes other transport brands. The Phoenix complaint capture contains no matching narratives; the headquarters capture supplies the complaint accounts.

View BBB customer reviews source ↗
4.45 / 5 · 1,226 reviews

BBB reports 186 complaints over three years, including 79 in the last 12 months; its status filters show 163 answered and 23 resolved. Answered means the business addressed the complaint, not that the customer accepted the outcome. Customer reviews are separate from formal complaints; no shipment denominator was supplied to calculate a complaint rate.

View BBB customer reviews source ↗
BBB accreditation
Not accredited
Accredited
BBB complaints · last 12 months
BBB complaints · last 3 years
Evidence snapshot date
October 16, 2026 — recorded evidence, not a live check
October 16, 2026 — recorded evidence, not a live check
Pricing Style
Mid-range
Mid-range
Price-change Risk
Medium
Medium
Best Fit
Balanced
balanced
Service Fit
Broadly balanced service profile; strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, urgent pickup, and inoperable vehicles
balanced is its stated overall fit; strong audited fits: open transport
MC Number
MC-89820
MC-873392
USDOT Number
3124544
2521690
Profile linksRequest a quote fromRoadRunner Auto Transport →Read full audit →Request a quote fromSGT Auto Transport →Read full audit →

Your shipment. Your choice of company.

Request a quote from the company you choose. Company contact and a shipment-specific quote come next—not an instant price.

Request a quote fromRoadRunner Auto Transport →
Loading approved reviews for RoadRunner Auto Transport…
Request a quote fromSGT Auto Transport →
Loading approved reviews for SGT Auto Transport…

How to use this comparison

Choose based on your shipment—not a headline score alone

The score is a useful starting point, but price certainty, vehicle type, pickup urgency, and the quality of the assigned carrier matter too. We compare audited signals instead of selling rank positions, then link to the underlying broker reports so you can verify the evidence before you request quotes.

Best fit by situation

When each broker may make more sense

RoadRunner Auto Transport

Audit score: 70/100 · Good Option

  • •strong audited fits: open transport, enclosed transport, urgent pickup, and inoperable vehicles
  • •8 years in business adds operating history
Read the full audit →

SGT Auto Transport

Audit score: 77/100 · Strong Recommended Option

Audit lead
  • •balanced shipping is a stated overall fit
  • •strong audited fits: open transport
  • •12 years in business adds operating history
Read the full audit →

Broker-by-broker analysis

What the audited evidence says

RoadRunner Auto Transport

Audit score: 70/100 · Good Option · Audited August 17, 2026

Full audit →

The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches the existing broker exactly: AM FREIGHT OPERATIONS INC, DBA ROADRUNNER AUTO TRANSPORT, USDOT 3124544 / MC-89820. It lists SHIPPER/BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration, authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), and no out-of-service date. The same snapshot warns that carrier registration information and carrier VMT are outdated and gives an October 7, 2021 MCS-150 filing date. Active authority does not erase that warning or independently verify a current bond or assigned-carrier insurance. The Sherpa snapshot misplaced in this folder belongs to SHERPA AUTO TRANSPORT LLC, USDOT 4085166 / MC-1555035, and is excluded from RoadRunner authority evidence. Zero inspections or crashes in a broker record is not a carrier safety endorsement. Favorable saved averages include Trustpilot 4.5/5 from 2,097 reviews and ConsumerAffairs 4.5/5 from 1,221; BBB’s separate A+ business grade is not its 4.25/5 customer rating. Transport Reviews displays five stars and 135 reviews, explicitly describing its rating as based on the last two years, not an all-time shipment-success rate. Dan L’s September 10, 2026 RoadRunner BBB review praises dispatch communication and delivery; the company thanks him the next day. Steve’s August 30, 2025 Transport Reviews account praises the assigned Shaunessy Transport carrier’s professionalism and communication. On ConsumerAffairs, Richard’s October 1, 2026 account describes a flexible Saturday pickup and safe California-to-Wisconsin delivery. Paul’s October 9 account praises upfront pricing and pickup while still noting a missed ETA without an update. Yelp reviewer Steve N, July 14, 2026, reports no price surprises and excellent driver communication but acknowledges pickup was two days later than initially advised. These accounts show successful shipments without establishing that every schedule or price is guaranteed. The cross-platform spread is material: Google shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 reviews, whereas the Phoenix Yelp listing shows 1.7/5 from 118. The V2/linked-branch BBB totals are 141 complaints in three years and 16 in the last 12 months, not 282 and 32 and not a RoadRunner-only rate. A September 30, 2026 BBB and ConsumerAffairs account by Nègmawon alleges a $1,200 quote became $1,800 after waiting 12 days against an approximately 72-hour pickup expectation; this is the same account on two platforms, not two independently verified incidents. Karen H’s August 23 BBB review describes a missed pickup and difficulty reaching support. A July 27 V2 complaint specifically naming RoadRunner alleges a $1,385 price, written assurance against an increase, and a later $1,795 charge; it is marked resolved following the response and customer acceptance. A June 26 complaint raises door-lock damage and a dispute over repair estimates. Yelp reviewer Jill R, September 17, alleges window/paint damage and difficulty accessing $150 additional coverage; the capture does not establish liability or a final claim outcome. Transport Reviews includes an October 12 account alleging repeated price increases. Negative-filtered captures and anonymous Reddit anecdotes do not establish prevalence, and similar accounts across sources may overlap. Source evidence reviewed October 16, 2026; the existing 70/100 score is historical and was not recalculated from this upload.

Read detailed findings · Authority, reviews, pricing & service

Authority and company record

USDOT 3124544 · MC-89820. The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches the existing broker exactly: AM FREIGHT OPERATIONS INC, DBA ROADRUNNER AUTO TRANSPORT, USDOT 3124544 / MC-89820. It lists SHIPPER/BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration, authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), and no out-of-service date. The same snapshot warns that carrier registration information and carrier VMT are outdated and gives an October 7, 2021 MCS-150 filing date. Active authority does not erase that warning or independently verify a current bond or assigned-carrier insurance. The Sherpa snapshot misplaced in this folder belongs to SHERPA AUTO TRANSPORT LLC, USDOT 4085166 / MC-1555035, and is excluded from RoadRunner authority evidence. Zero inspections or crashes in a broker record is not a carrier safety endorsement. The matched SAFER record gives 15 Grumman Road West, Suite 1500, Bethpage, New York 11714 and (888) 777-2123; the Google and Trustpilot captures point to the same RoadRunner location and phone. BBB instead names V2 Logistics Corp. at that headquarters, lists Roadrunner Auto Transport and Road Runner Auto Transport as alternate names, and links a RoadRunner branch at 4411 South 40th Street, Suite D3, Phoenix. This supports a directory/brand association, not proof that V2 and AM Freight are the same legal registrant or that one succeeded the other. V2 lists a March 7, 2012 business start and incorporation, a December 16, 2011 BBB file opening, and no accreditation; the Phoenix branch file opened July 10, 2019. These group/branch dates are not transplanted into AM Freight’s business-start field. V2 also covers Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico and Caribbean Car Transport; their customer accounts must not automatically be attributed to a RoadRunner mainland shipment. The Phoenix BBB source is https://www.bbb.org/us/az/phoenix/profile/auto-transportation/roadrunner-auto-transport-1126-1000062557. A broker’s zero-inspection record is not evidence of a carrier’s safety performance.

Reviews and customer experience

Google 4.1/5 from 8,647 reviews (The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for RoadRunner at 15 Grumman Road West, Bethpage shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 Google reviews. This is a saved search capture, not a live Google check. Its ConsumerAffairs web-review snippet has a different count from the supplied direct ConsumerAffairs profile; those counts are not combined.). Trustpilot 4.5/5 from 2,097 reviews. Yelp 1.7/5 from 118 reviews. Transport Reviews 5/5 with 135 reviews displayed on the supplied profile; its star rating uses the last two years. ConsumerAffairs 4.5/5 from 1,221 reviews. BBB business grade A+; customer reviews 4.25/5 from 887 reviews; not accredited. The cross-platform spread is material: Google shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 reviews, whereas the Phoenix Yelp listing shows 1.7/5 from 118. The V2/linked-branch BBB totals are 141 complaints in three years and 16 in the last 12 months, not 282 and 32 and not a RoadRunner-only rate. A September 30, 2026 BBB and ConsumerAffairs account by Nègmawon alleges a $1,200 quote became $1,800 after waiting 12 days against an approximately 72-hour pickup expectation; this is the same account on two platforms, not two independently verified incidents. Karen H’s August 23 BBB review describes a missed pickup and difficulty reaching support. A July 27 V2 complaint specifically naming RoadRunner alleges a $1,385 price, written assurance against an increase, and a later $1,795 charge; it is marked resolved following the response and customer acceptance. A June 26 complaint raises door-lock damage and a dispute over repair estimates. Yelp reviewer Jill R, September 17, alleges window/paint damage and difficulty accessing $150 additional coverage; the capture does not establish liability or a final claim outcome. Transport Reviews includes an October 12 account alleging repeated price increases. Negative-filtered captures and anonymous Reddit anecdotes do not establish prevalence, and similar accounts across sources may overlap. RoadRunner’s October 1, 2026 reply to Nègmawon apologizes, attributes the revised offer to demand and carrier availability, calls the rate increase optional, and says the customer could decline or cancel at no charge. Its August 24 reply to Karen acknowledges inadequate updates and apologizes. In the July 27 BBB price dispute, the July 28 business reply offers a partial goodwill refund; the customer explicitly accepts the resolution that day. The amount of that partial refund is not specified, so it is not represented as a full $410 reimbursement. In the June 26 damage exchange, the company first cites a two-repair-estimate requirement, then says it waived the requirement and approved the claim; BBB still labels the complaint answered, not resolved, and the capture does not prove payment. In a May 21 BBB reply about belongings and unloading, it says the cars exceeded the 100-pound/below-window allowance, waived a $100 dry-run fee and $135 post-dispatch cancellation fee, and processed a full refund. These are case-specific business statements, not a universal cancellation policy or independently verified payments. Trustpilot displays replies to 100% of negative reviews, typically within 24 hours; that is a platform response metric, not a finding that every complaint was settled. Favorable saved averages include Trustpilot 4.5/5 from 2,097 reviews and ConsumerAffairs 4.5/5 from 1,221; BBB’s separate A+ business grade is not its 4.25/5 customer rating. Transport Reviews displays five stars and 135 reviews, explicitly describing its rating as based on the last two years, not an all-time shipment-success rate. Dan L’s September 10, 2026 RoadRunner BBB review praises dispatch communication and delivery; the company thanks him the next day. Steve’s August 30, 2025 Transport Reviews account praises the assigned Shaunessy Transport carrier’s professionalism and communication. On ConsumerAffairs, Richard’s October 1, 2026 account describes a flexible Saturday pickup and safe California-to-Wisconsin delivery. Paul’s October 9 account praises upfront pricing and pickup while still noting a missed ETA without an update. Yelp reviewer Steve N, July 14, 2026, reports no price surprises and excellent driver communication but acknowledges pickup was two days later than initially advised. These accounts show successful shipments without establishing that every schedule or price is guaranteed. The cross-platform spread is material: Google shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 reviews, whereas the Phoenix Yelp listing shows 1.7/5 from 118. The V2/linked-branch BBB totals are 141 complaints in three years and 16 in the last 12 months, not 282 and 32 and not a RoadRunner-only rate. A September 30, 2026 BBB and ConsumerAffairs account by Nègmawon alleges a $1,200 quote became $1,800 after waiting 12 days against an approximately 72-hour pickup expectation; this is the same account on two platforms, not two independently verified incidents. Karen H’s August 23 BBB review describes a missed pickup and difficulty reaching support. A July 27 V2 complaint specifically naming RoadRunner alleges a $1,385 price, written assurance against an increase, and a later $1,795 charge; it is marked resolved following the response and customer acceptance. A June 26 complaint raises door-lock damage and a dispute over repair estimates. Yelp reviewer Jill R, September 17, alleges window/paint damage and difficulty accessing $150 additional coverage; the capture does not establish liability or a final claim outcome. Transport Reviews includes an October 12 account alleging repeated price increases. Negative-filtered captures and anonymous Reddit anecdotes do not establish prevalence, and similar accounts across sources may overlap. RoadRunner’s October 1, 2026 reply to Nègmawon apologizes, attributes the revised offer to demand and carrier availability, calls the rate increase optional, and says the customer could decline or cancel at no charge. Its August 24 reply to Karen acknowledges inadequate updates and apologizes. In the July 27 BBB price dispute, the July 28 business reply offers a partial goodwill refund; the customer explicitly accepts the resolution that day. The amount of that partial refund is not specified, so it is not represented as a full $410 reimbursement. In the June 26 damage exchange, the company first cites a two-repair-estimate requirement, then says it waived the requirement and approved the claim; BBB still labels the complaint answered, not resolved, and the capture does not prove payment. In a May 21 BBB reply about belongings and unloading, it says the cars exceeded the 100-pound/below-window allowance, waived a $100 dry-run fee and $135 post-dispatch cancellation fee, and processed a full refund. These are case-specific business statements, not a universal cancellation policy or independently verified payments. Trustpilot displays replies to 100% of negative reviews, typically within 24 hours; that is a platform response metric, not a finding that every complaint was settled. These are published accounts, not independently verified shipments. Similar stories across platforms may describe the same transaction.

Pricing and service fit

Get the contracting legal entity and USDOT/MC in writing rather than substituting V2’s name or the misplaced Sherpa record. Separate the initial estimate from the accepted carrier price and require written approval before any increase. Distinguish a ready date, an estimated pickup window and any genuinely guaranteed service, including its remedy. Obtain broker fee, carrier balance, charge timing, cancellation rules before and after dispatch, and any dry-run charge. Confirm the personal-property weight and storage limits before loading. Ask whether “tracking” provides live GPS or only shipment-status updates and obtain the actual carrier’s contact details and after-hours escalation route. Document vehicle condition on pickup/delivery inspection reports and photographs, and request written additional-coverage exclusions, reporting deadlines and repair-estimate requirements. Neither a review-site insurance description nor an A+ BBB grade substitutes for current carrier insurance or the signed shipment agreement. The supplied pages do not establish measured performance on every route or transport type. Confirm the actual carrier, pickup window, vehicle condition requirements and any terminal or ocean segment. Individual review prices are historical examples, not current lane quotes.

Transparency and brand signals

The matched SAFER record gives 15 Grumman Road West, Suite 1500, Bethpage, New York 11714 and (888) 777-2123; the Google and Trustpilot captures point to the same RoadRunner location and phone. BBB instead names V2 Logistics Corp. at that headquarters, lists Roadrunner Auto Transport and Road Runner Auto Transport as alternate names, and links a RoadRunner branch at 4411 South 40th Street, Suite D3, Phoenix. This supports a directory/brand association, not proof that V2 and AM Freight are the same legal registrant or that one succeeded the other. V2 lists a March 7, 2012 business start and incorporation, a December 16, 2011 BBB file opening, and no accreditation; the Phoenix branch file opened July 10, 2019. These group/branch dates are not transplanted into AM Freight’s business-start field. V2 also covers Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico and Caribbean Car Transport; their customer accounts must not automatically be attributed to a RoadRunner mainland shipment. The Phoenix BBB source is https://www.bbb.org/us/az/phoenix/profile/auto-transportation/roadrunner-auto-transport-1126-1000062557. This update uses 21 user-supplied saved pages reviewed October 16, 2026, not live platform checks. Filtered negative pages overlap the main profiles and must not be added to their totals. Company replies are attributed claims; answered complaints are not necessarily resolved. The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for RoadRunner at 15 Grumman Road West, Bethpage shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 Google reviews. This is a saved search capture, not a live Google check. Its ConsumerAffairs web-review snippet has a different count from the supplied direct ConsumerAffairs profile; those counts are not combined. Source evidence reviewed October 16, 2026; the existing 70/100 score is historical and was not recalculated from this upload.

Positive signals

  • Favorable saved averages include Trustpilot 4.5/5 from 2,097 reviews and ConsumerAffairs 4.5/5 from 1,221; BBB’s separate A+ business grade is not its 4.25/5 customer rating. Transport Reviews displays five stars and 135 reviews, explicitly describing its rating as based on the last two years, not an all-time shipment-success rate. Dan L’s September 10, 2026 RoadRunner BBB review praises dispatch communication and delivery; the company thanks him the next day. Steve’s August 30, 2025 Transport Reviews account praises the assigned Shaunessy Transport carrier’s professionalism and communication. On ConsumerAffairs, Richard’s October 1, 2026 account describes a flexible Saturday pickup and safe California-to-Wisconsin delivery. Paul’s October 9 account praises upfront pricing and pickup while still noting a missed ETA without an update. Yelp reviewer Steve N, July 14, 2026, reports no price surprises and excellent driver communication but acknowledges pickup was two days later than initially advised. These accounts show successful shipments without establishing that every schedule or price is guaranteed.

What to verify

  • The cross-platform spread is material: Google shows 4.1/5 from 8,647 reviews, whereas the Phoenix Yelp listing shows 1.7/5 from 118. The V2/linked-branch BBB totals are 141 complaints in three years and 16 in the last 12 months, not 282 and 32 and not a RoadRunner-only rate. A September 30, 2026 BBB and ConsumerAffairs account by Nègmawon alleges a $1,200 quote became $1,800 after waiting 12 days against an approximately 72-hour pickup expectation; this is the same account on two platforms, not two independently verified incidents. Karen H’s August 23 BBB review describes a missed pickup and difficulty reaching support. A July 27 V2 complaint specifically naming RoadRunner alleges a $1,385 price, written assurance against an increase, and a later $1,795 charge; it is marked resolved following the response and customer acceptance. A June 26 complaint raises door-lock damage and a dispute over repair estimates. Yelp reviewer Jill R, September 17, alleges window/paint damage and difficulty accessing $150 additional coverage; the capture does not establish liability or a final claim outcome. Transport Reviews includes an October 12 account alleging repeated price increases. Negative-filtered captures and anonymous Reddit anecdotes do not establish prevalence, and similar accounts across sources may overlap.

SGT Auto Transport

Audit score: 77/100 · Strong Recommended Option · Audited April 6, 2026

Full audit →

The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches USDOT 2521690 / MC-873392, lists legal name SGT AUTO TRANSPORT, entity type BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration and authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), with no out-of-service date. Its physical and mailing address is 80 Orville Drive, Suite 100, Bohemia, New York 11716, with (864) 546-5038. The MCS-150 form-date field is blank; no formation date is inferred from it. This is broker authority, not proof that SGT operates the hauling truck, that a particular carrier is insured, or that live bond status has been checked. Zero power units, inspections and crashes in this broker snapshot are not a fleet safety rating. Google’s saved knowledge panel shows a high-volume 4.6/5 from 16,109 reviews, Trustpilot 4.3/5 from 1,639 and BBB customer reviews 4.45/5 from 1,226. Chanda B’s October 7, 2026 BBB account describes smooth coordination, pickup and delivery at the scheduled times and good pricing; SGT acknowledges the feedback October 8. Scott S, October 6, praises reasonable upfront pricing and communication. On Trustpilot, Nicole Nelson’s October 14 experience describes a stress-free first Florida-to-California shipment with professional drivers; SGT thanks her in its saved reply. Javonte’s October 8 experience describes efficient New York-to-Texas service and clear updates. ConsumerAffairs’ featured Olga review, March 22, 2025, says the quoted price was accurate and the transport took one day; Wayne’s March 11 featured review describes seamless pickup, delivery and driver communication. These are selected customer accounts, not guarantees. ConsumerAffairs reviewer Alyssa’s August 21, 2026 update says her cancellation fee was waived and improves her assessment despite canceling; this favorable follow-up must accompany the original fee complaint. Lower platform snapshots warrant attention alongside the stronger Google/BBB customer averages: Yelp 2.9/5 from 699 reviews, ConsumerAffairs 3.7/5 from 1,095, and Transport Reviews two stars with 27 reviews, with the latter explicitly based on the last two years. BBB’s B grade and 186 three-year/79 last-year complaints are distinct from the 4.45/5 customer-review rating. E S’s October 8, 2026 BBB review alleges pickup on October 5 after a September 30–October 2 window and inadequate proactive updates. An August 31 BBB complaint alleges a $1,550 quote became more than $2,000. An August 18 complaint disputes a $199 retained cancellation fee after an $885 quote became $1,250, subsequent collections and an additional $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer disputes SGT’s double-booking explanation. Halyna’s August 13–14 ConsumerAffairs/Transport Reviews accounts describe the same cancellation/collections themes and a proposed refund allegedly conditioned on removing negative reviews; these are disputed accounts, not independent findings of manipulation or separate verified incidents. Yelp reviewer Mayura P, August 21, alleges a $1,450-to-$1,700 increase and a conditional $250 refund offer while also saying the car arrived on time without scratches. ConsumerAffairs’ headline star percentages do not reconcile with its displayed rating-filter counts; neither is used to calculate a new distribution. Filtered negative captures, repeated reviewer updates and Reddit posts cannot establish a company-wide failure rate. Source evidence reviewed October 16, 2026; the existing 77/100 score is historical and was not recalculated from this upload.

Read detailed findings · Authority, reviews, pricing & service

Authority and company record

USDOT 2521690 · MC-873392. The October 14, 2026 SAFER snapshot matches USDOT 2521690 / MC-873392, lists legal name SGT AUTO TRANSPORT, entity type BROKER, ACTIVE USDOT registration and authorization as Broker of Property (Except Household Goods), with no out-of-service date. Its physical and mailing address is 80 Orville Drive, Suite 100, Bohemia, New York 11716, with (864) 546-5038. The MCS-150 form-date field is blank; no formation date is inferred from it. This is broker authority, not proof that SGT operates the hauling truck, that a particular carrier is insured, or that live bond status has been checked. Zero power units, inspections and crashes in this broker snapshot are not a fleet safety rating. BBB’s SGT Auto Transport Corp. profile matches the SAFER address and phone and reports a July 10, 2014 business start, September 1, 2023 incorporation, October 2, 2023 BBB file opening and accreditation since October 31, 2023. These dates describe different events; incorporation/accreditation in 2023 does not establish that operations only began then. SAFER’s legal-name display omits “Corp.”, but the federal identifiers, location and contact details match the existing broker rather than a different authority. The company-written Trustpilot description claims an A BBB rating; the supplied direct BBB profile instead shows B and cites 186 complaints. The direct BBB snapshot is used for the grade, without treating the company’s promotional description as an independent verification of fleet size, customers served or insurance coverage. A broker’s zero-inspection record is not evidence of a carrier’s safety performance.

Reviews and customer experience

Google 4.6/5 from 16,109 reviews (The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for Car Shipping - SGT Auto Transport at 80 Orville Drive, Bohemia shows 4.6/5 from 16,109 Google reviews. A separate organic result displays 4.6 from 16,514; it is not the knowledge-panel count and is not substituted or added. Saved search evidence only; not independently checked live.). Trustpilot 4.3/5 from 1,639 reviews. Yelp 2.9/5 from 699 reviews. Transport Reviews 2/5 with 27 reviews displayed on the supplied profile; its star rating uses the last two years. ConsumerAffairs 3.7/5 from 1,095 reviews. BBB business grade B; customer reviews 4.45/5 from 1226 reviews; accredited. Lower platform snapshots warrant attention alongside the stronger Google/BBB customer averages: Yelp 2.9/5 from 699 reviews, ConsumerAffairs 3.7/5 from 1,095, and Transport Reviews two stars with 27 reviews, with the latter explicitly based on the last two years. BBB’s B grade and 186 three-year/79 last-year complaints are distinct from the 4.45/5 customer-review rating. E S’s October 8, 2026 BBB review alleges pickup on October 5 after a September 30–October 2 window and inadequate proactive updates. An August 31 BBB complaint alleges a $1,550 quote became more than $2,000. An August 18 complaint disputes a $199 retained cancellation fee after an $885 quote became $1,250, subsequent collections and an additional $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer disputes SGT’s double-booking explanation. Halyna’s August 13–14 ConsumerAffairs/Transport Reviews accounts describe the same cancellation/collections themes and a proposed refund allegedly conditioned on removing negative reviews; these are disputed accounts, not independent findings of manipulation or separate verified incidents. Yelp reviewer Mayura P, August 21, alleges a $1,450-to-$1,700 increase and a conditional $250 refund offer while also saying the car arrived on time without scratches. ConsumerAffairs’ headline star percentages do not reconcile with its displayed rating-filter counts; neither is used to calculate a new distribution. Filtered negative captures, repeated reviewer updates and Reddit posts cannot establish a company-wide failure rate. SGT’s October 12, 2026 reply to E S acknowledges communication concerns, says carrier availability can change after an earlier pickup option is declined, and states the shipment was ultimately completed. Its August 31 BBB response says quotes are market-based estimates, revised offers may be declined, and that particular order was canceled without a cancellation fee; the BBB status remains answered, despite the company calling the matter resolved. In the August 18 cancellation dispute, SGT cites its signed contract and alleged double-booking, maintains the $199 fee was due and says it waived the extra $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer expressly rejects the double-booking characterization. Its October 14 reply to Robert J disputes a deposit-theft allegation and says it was unable to collect the cancellation fee, so that review is not evidence of a confirmed stolen deposit. In a September 21 BBB reply about tracking, SGT explains that the feature shows order status, not live GPS for every independent carrier. Its August 24 reply to Lynn says VIP phone access is optional and email/live chat remain available without the additional fee. Trustpilot reviewer Philip Arellano’s October 9 damage report is accompanied by SGT’s same-day reply saying it had not received a prior damage report, had attempted contact and emailed a damage form; the supplied record does not establish the claim outcome. SGT characterizes good-faith resolution discussions as attempts to settle concerns, not an admission of wrongdoing. Trustpilot’s 100% negative-review response metric and typical reply within 24 hours do not prove accepted resolutions. Google’s saved knowledge panel shows a high-volume 4.6/5 from 16,109 reviews, Trustpilot 4.3/5 from 1,639 and BBB customer reviews 4.45/5 from 1,226. Chanda B’s October 7, 2026 BBB account describes smooth coordination, pickup and delivery at the scheduled times and good pricing; SGT acknowledges the feedback October 8. Scott S, October 6, praises reasonable upfront pricing and communication. On Trustpilot, Nicole Nelson’s October 14 experience describes a stress-free first Florida-to-California shipment with professional drivers; SGT thanks her in its saved reply. Javonte’s October 8 experience describes efficient New York-to-Texas service and clear updates. ConsumerAffairs’ featured Olga review, March 22, 2025, says the quoted price was accurate and the transport took one day; Wayne’s March 11 featured review describes seamless pickup, delivery and driver communication. These are selected customer accounts, not guarantees. ConsumerAffairs reviewer Alyssa’s August 21, 2026 update says her cancellation fee was waived and improves her assessment despite canceling; this favorable follow-up must accompany the original fee complaint. Lower platform snapshots warrant attention alongside the stronger Google/BBB customer averages: Yelp 2.9/5 from 699 reviews, ConsumerAffairs 3.7/5 from 1,095, and Transport Reviews two stars with 27 reviews, with the latter explicitly based on the last two years. BBB’s B grade and 186 three-year/79 last-year complaints are distinct from the 4.45/5 customer-review rating. E S’s October 8, 2026 BBB review alleges pickup on October 5 after a September 30–October 2 window and inadequate proactive updates. An August 31 BBB complaint alleges a $1,550 quote became more than $2,000. An August 18 complaint disputes a $199 retained cancellation fee after an $885 quote became $1,250, subsequent collections and an additional $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer disputes SGT’s double-booking explanation. Halyna’s August 13–14 ConsumerAffairs/Transport Reviews accounts describe the same cancellation/collections themes and a proposed refund allegedly conditioned on removing negative reviews; these are disputed accounts, not independent findings of manipulation or separate verified incidents. Yelp reviewer Mayura P, August 21, alleges a $1,450-to-$1,700 increase and a conditional $250 refund offer while also saying the car arrived on time without scratches. ConsumerAffairs’ headline star percentages do not reconcile with its displayed rating-filter counts; neither is used to calculate a new distribution. Filtered negative captures, repeated reviewer updates and Reddit posts cannot establish a company-wide failure rate. SGT’s October 12, 2026 reply to E S acknowledges communication concerns, says carrier availability can change after an earlier pickup option is declined, and states the shipment was ultimately completed. Its August 31 BBB response says quotes are market-based estimates, revised offers may be declined, and that particular order was canceled without a cancellation fee; the BBB status remains answered, despite the company calling the matter resolved. In the August 18 cancellation dispute, SGT cites its signed contract and alleged double-booking, maintains the $199 fee was due and says it waived the extra $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer expressly rejects the double-booking characterization. Its October 14 reply to Robert J disputes a deposit-theft allegation and says it was unable to collect the cancellation fee, so that review is not evidence of a confirmed stolen deposit. In a September 21 BBB reply about tracking, SGT explains that the feature shows order status, not live GPS for every independent carrier. Its August 24 reply to Lynn says VIP phone access is optional and email/live chat remain available without the additional fee. Trustpilot reviewer Philip Arellano’s October 9 damage report is accompanied by SGT’s same-day reply saying it had not received a prior damage report, had attempted contact and emailed a damage form; the supplied record does not establish the claim outcome. SGT characterizes good-faith resolution discussions as attempts to settle concerns, not an admission of wrongdoing. Trustpilot’s 100% negative-review response metric and typical reply within 24 hours do not prove accepted resolutions. These are published accounts, not independently verified shipments. Similar stories across platforms may describe the same transaction.

Pricing and service fit

Before authorizing payment, obtain the final carrier offer, broker fee and charge timing, and distinguish a quote/price-match claim from a binding total. Read the actual signed cancellation and refund provisions together: the saved company replies cite a $199 fee for specified circumstances including cancellation during an active pickup window or double-booking, while customers dispute whether those triggers applied. Request a written explanation of what constitutes double-booking versus requesting competing quotes, when the pickup window expires, how to cancel in writing, and whether refusing a higher offer permits a fee-free cancellation. Replies also describe a possible $200 chargeback-related fee and collections; these are the company’s contractual assertions, not a ruling on enforceability or a limitation of statutory dispute rights. Keep all quote versions, cancellation notices and payment records. Confirm the price and remedy of any guaranteed/express pickup service separately from ordinary estimates; ask about standard versus paid phone support, order-status tracking versus GPS, personal-property limits, and the carrier’s insurance and damage-report procedure. Ask for every settlement condition in writing without assuming that an offered refund was paid or that a dispute has been resolved. The supplied pages do not establish measured performance on every route or transport type. Confirm the actual carrier, pickup window, vehicle condition requirements and any terminal or ocean segment. Individual review prices are historical examples, not current lane quotes.

Transparency and brand signals

BBB’s SGT Auto Transport Corp. profile matches the SAFER address and phone and reports a July 10, 2014 business start, September 1, 2023 incorporation, October 2, 2023 BBB file opening and accreditation since October 31, 2023. These dates describe different events; incorporation/accreditation in 2023 does not establish that operations only began then. SAFER’s legal-name display omits “Corp.”, but the federal identifiers, location and contact details match the existing broker rather than a different authority. The company-written Trustpilot description claims an A BBB rating; the supplied direct BBB profile instead shows B and cites 186 complaints. The direct BBB snapshot is used for the grade, without treating the company’s promotional description as an independent verification of fleet size, customers served or insurance coverage. This update uses 16 user-supplied saved pages reviewed October 16, 2026, not live platform checks. Filtered negative pages overlap the main profiles and must not be added to their totals. Company replies are attributed claims; answered complaints are not necessarily resolved. The supplied Google Search knowledge panel for Car Shipping - SGT Auto Transport at 80 Orville Drive, Bohemia shows 4.6/5 from 16,109 Google reviews. A separate organic result displays 4.6 from 16,514; it is not the knowledge-panel count and is not substituted or added. Saved search evidence only; not independently checked live. Source evidence reviewed October 16, 2026; the existing 77/100 score is historical and was not recalculated from this upload.

Positive signals

  • Google’s saved knowledge panel shows a high-volume 4.6/5 from 16,109 reviews, Trustpilot 4.3/5 from 1,639 and BBB customer reviews 4.45/5 from 1,226. Chanda B’s October 7, 2026 BBB account describes smooth coordination, pickup and delivery at the scheduled times and good pricing; SGT acknowledges the feedback October 8. Scott S, October 6, praises reasonable upfront pricing and communication. On Trustpilot, Nicole Nelson’s October 14 experience describes a stress-free first Florida-to-California shipment with professional drivers; SGT thanks her in its saved reply. Javonte’s October 8 experience describes efficient New York-to-Texas service and clear updates. ConsumerAffairs’ featured Olga review, March 22, 2025, says the quoted price was accurate and the transport took one day; Wayne’s March 11 featured review describes seamless pickup, delivery and driver communication. These are selected customer accounts, not guarantees. ConsumerAffairs reviewer Alyssa’s August 21, 2026 update says her cancellation fee was waived and improves her assessment despite canceling; this favorable follow-up must accompany the original fee complaint.

What to verify

  • Lower platform snapshots warrant attention alongside the stronger Google/BBB customer averages: Yelp 2.9/5 from 699 reviews, ConsumerAffairs 3.7/5 from 1,095, and Transport Reviews two stars with 27 reviews, with the latter explicitly based on the last two years. BBB’s B grade and 186 three-year/79 last-year complaints are distinct from the 4.45/5 customer-review rating. E S’s October 8, 2026 BBB review alleges pickup on October 5 after a September 30–October 2 window and inadequate proactive updates. An August 31 BBB complaint alleges a $1,550 quote became more than $2,000. An August 18 complaint disputes a $199 retained cancellation fee after an $885 quote became $1,250, subsequent collections and an additional $200 chargeback-related amount; the customer disputes SGT’s double-booking explanation. Halyna’s August 13–14 ConsumerAffairs/Transport Reviews accounts describe the same cancellation/collections themes and a proposed refund allegedly conditioned on removing negative reviews; these are disputed accounts, not independent findings of manipulation or separate verified incidents. Yelp reviewer Mayura P, August 21, alleges a $1,450-to-$1,700 increase and a conditional $250 refund offer while also saying the car arrived on time without scratches. ConsumerAffairs’ headline star percentages do not reconcile with its displayed rating-filter counts; neither is used to calculate a new distribution. Filtered negative captures, repeated reviewer updates and Reddit posts cannot establish a company-wide failure rate.

Before you book

Get the terms in writing

Ask each broker for the total price, deposit and cancellation terms, pickup window, carrier information when assigned, cargo coverage, and how price changes are handled. A strong audit profile does not replace reading the agreement for your specific shipment.

Frequently asked questions

How should I compare RoadRunner Auto Transport and SGT Auto Transport?

Start with the available audit evidence, then compare the written quote, carrier-assignment process, pickup window, cancellation terms, and service fit.

Which company has the higher current audit score?

SGT Auto Transport currently has the highest score. The score summarizes available evidence, but it cannot guarantee a specific carrier, final price, or pickup outcome.

Which shipment needs separate RoadRunner Auto Transport and SGT Auto Transport?

The current audit rates these as strong service fits: RoadRunner Auto Transport: open transport, enclosed transport, urgent pickup, and inoperable vehicles; SGT Auto Transport: open transport. Confirm the written quote and actual carrier availability for your specific vehicle and route.

Does the higher trust score guarantee a better shipment?

No. The score summarizes current audit evidence; it cannot guarantee a specific carrier, final price, pickup timing, or shipment outcome. Always confirm the written quote, carrier details, insurance, and cancellation terms before booking.

Your shipment. Your choice of company.

Request a quote from the company you choose. Company contact and a shipment-specific quote come next—not an instant price.

Request a quote fromRoadRunner Auto Transport →
Loading approved reviews for RoadRunner Auto Transport…
Request a quote fromSGT Auto Transport →
Loading approved reviews for SGT Auto Transport…

Which company would you like to contact?

Choose a company. Your request is not an instant price; the company will contact you with quote details.

Build your shortlist

Find another company to compare

Search company records or filter by home state. A company’s home base does not establish where it ships. Compare up to three distinct companies.

  • RoadRunner Auto Transport
  • SGT Auto Transport

2 of 3 selected. Add a third company or open your current shortlist.

Showing 6 of 4944 matching company records.

Next, the journey

Plan your shipping route

Read a route guide for the next part of your research. These links do not establish that any company serves a route.

Browse all routes →